Comments on: Could It Be That China Is Developing An Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile? And Would The U.S. Tolerate It? http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/ Stirring Trouble Internationally provides an witty, alternative viewpoint on todays news stories and current affairs. Funny, informative, and occasionally controversial. Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:26:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Bryan Ling Tse kwang http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3586 Bryan Ling Tse kwang Sun, 11 Jul 2010 03:34:43 +0000 http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/#comment-3586 So will the US tolerate the PLA building anti ship weapons targetting US carriers? The Chinese have been living under the threat of nuclear destruction by US nw since 1949 .Hark back to the opium era and you will know how the Chinese feel.Even now US missiles are primed on 15 minute alert status to attack Red China,sorry,China. This a game. If the carriers are poised to attack,shdnt the Chinese have the means to deter /destroy them?If the roles were reversed,what would the US do?It would do the same thing.Similarly what would the Pentagon do if PLA destroyers are off LA?Deter or destroy them even if it means ww3. Btw this is 2010 and not 1945 up to 2005. when the uS could do anything it wanted.All good things must come to an end. If the US really want the good times to go on indefinitely,now is a good time to perpetuate its supremacy by unleashing a war against China.Otherwise with the march of time the price for defeating China will go up. It can only go up to a point where the US will find it not worth defending Taiwan.Believe me Taiwan will go back to China ultimately. Oh then China will be a bigger threat to to Asia if not the world.Then the pentagon with the connivance of the neo cons will clamour for more money to build up US forces to defend America ie attack other countries which can rolled over.Yes the US can prevail over China but at enormous risk and price. And by the way US turf must not be touched if the US were to attack China. Hence the missile shield which is gimmick. Oh we have to stop anuclear attack on US soil.the best way is not to unleash a US attack on others using nw.Then the other guy will hit back with nw even if the US initiates the attack. Incidentally, if the US were to conventional means to destroys China' nw,don't bet on the PLA not resorting to nw. I repeat the way to avoid a n attack on US is for the Pentagon not to use nw.You will reap what you sow. So will the US tolerate the PLA building anti ship weapons targetting US carriers?
The Chinese have been living under the threat of nuclear destruction by US nw since 1949 .Hark back to the opium era and you will know how the Chinese feel.Even now US missiles are primed on 15 minute alert status to attack Red China,sorry,China.
This a game. If the carriers are poised to attack,shdnt the Chinese have the means to deter /destroy them?If the roles were reversed,what would the US do?It would do the same thing.Similarly what would the Pentagon do if PLA destroyers are off LA?Deter or destroy them even if it means ww3.
Btw this is 2010 and not 1945 up to 2005. when the uS could do anything it wanted.All good things must come to an end. If the US really want the good times to go on indefinitely,now is a good time to perpetuate its supremacy by unleashing a war against China.Otherwise with the march of time the price for

defeating China will go up. It can only go up to a point where the US will find it not worth defending Taiwan.Believe me Taiwan will go back to China ultimately.
Oh then China will be a bigger threat to to Asia if not the world.Then the pentagon with the connivance of the neo cons will clamour for more money to build up US forces to defend America ie attack other countries which can rolled over.Yes the US can prevail over China but at enormous risk and price.
And by the way US turf must not be touched if the US were to attack China. Hence the missile shield which is gimmick. Oh we have to stop anuclear attack on US soil.the best way is not to unleash a US attack on others using nw.Then the other guy will hit back with nw even if the US initiates the attack.
Incidentally, if the US were to conventional means to destroys China’ nw,don’t bet on the PLA not resorting to nw. I repeat the way to avoid a n attack on US is for the Pentagon not to use nw.You will reap what you sow.

]]> By: James Wong http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3467 James Wong Sun, 06 Jun 2010 05:02:16 +0000 http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/#comment-3467 Why shdnt the Chines build anti ship missile.?It's for defence .The US carriers are for offence and power projection. The pentagon must learn to accept that the the China of 2010 is not the China of 1950s to the 90s when two US ac intimidated them. Those days are gone repeat gone for good. The PLA aint looking for a fight. The us says it does not support Taiwan independence.You never know. History is full of instances of treachery.That is why the PLA is modernising so that the taiwanese will think twice/thrice/x times before declaring independence. I believ a time will come when taiwan will have to re unite with China.Not now or y years.in the yeras to come the PLA will become stronger so taht in a fight the damage to the US will not be worth defending Taiwan. It has not come as yet.Even if the US were to upgrade its weapons it wont be able to prevent the PLA from inflicting unacceptable l damage on the US. Lest I forget the US would have won .The question is is it worth the price. I refer to kennedy 1961. The US will pay any price to defend freedom. No it is to attack. Why shdnt the Chines build anti ship missile.?It’s for defence .The US carriers are for offence and power projection.
The pentagon must learn to accept that the the China of 2010 is not the China of 1950s to the 90s when two US ac intimidated them. Those days are gone repeat gone for good.
The PLA aint looking for a fight. The us says it does not support Taiwan independence.You never know. History is full of instances of treachery.That is why the PLA is modernising so that the taiwanese will think twice/thrice/x times before declaring independence.
I believ a time will come when taiwan will have to re unite with China.Not now or y years.in the yeras to come the PLA will become stronger so taht in a fight the damage to the US will not be worth defending Taiwan. It has not come as yet.Even if the US were to upgrade its weapons it wont be able to prevent the PLA from inflicting unacceptable l damage on the US. Lest I forget the US would have won .The question is is it worth the price.
I refer to kennedy 1961. The US will pay any price to defend freedom. No it is to attack.

]]> By: Graham Rankin http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1140 Graham Rankin Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:11:33 +0000 http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2009/06/28/could-it-be-that-china-is-developing-an-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-and-would-the-us-tolerate-it/#comment-1140 The ASBN is part of a range of weapons on China's fabled 'Taiwan Shopping List.' It's the package overall that's intimidating to the US. The anti-satellite system tested two years ago is designed to take out the GPS system, run by the USAF but which will collapse if three or more satellites go down. There's also the Anti-Spy Satellite laser system, successfully tested last year, and the anti-submarine submarine programme! Then there's the financial lever of several $trillion in dollars and bonds, that if dumped would hurt both sides, but the threat of wrecking the US economy might matter more to a democracy than to China. Last, but not least, is the multi-billion cyber-warfare project to infiltrate Western computers at every level, including electricity distribution. I'm not paranoid myself, but if I worked for the CIA in Taiwan I'd be on sick leave for hyper-tension! The ASBN is part of a range of weapons on China’s fabled ‘Taiwan Shopping List.’ It’s the package overall that’s intimidating to the US. The anti-satellite system tested two years ago is designed to take out the GPS system, run by the USAF but which will collapse if three or more satellites go down. There’s also the Anti-Spy Satellite laser system, successfully tested last year, and the anti-submarine submarine programme! Then there’s the financial lever of several $trillion in dollars and bonds, that if dumped would hurt both sides, but the threat of wrecking the US economy might matter more to a democracy than to China. Last, but not least, is the multi-billion cyber-warfare project to infiltrate Western computers at every level, including electricity distribution. I’m not paranoid myself, but if I worked for the CIA in Taiwan I’d be on sick leave for hyper-tension!

]]>