Browse > Home / Let's Be Cynical / Is Gordon Brown Fit To Be In Office? Let’s Ask The Medics

Is Gordon Brown Fit To Be In Office? Let’s Ask The Medics

July 3, 2009

Doctor Thomas Mathew writes: Don’t you sometimes get a feeling that Prime Minister Gordon Brown is living in some fantasy world? I would even say in a cuckoo-land where figures never add up, where black is constantly referred to as white and where being economical with the truth is not considered a big deal. Oh yes, and where absurd statements are regularly made and are expected to be accepted as examples of common sense, and even wisdom.

You probably want me to give you an example of such a statement. And that is exactly what I am going to do. During the last Prime Minister’s question time in the House of Commons this week Mr Brown was asked by David Cameron, leader of the opposition, to reveal whether the government was planning to make cuts in public spending, considering the debt burden it has created. The Prime Minister, keeping a perfectly straight face, said that no cuts were planned and that total public spending would continue to rise and increase in 2013/2014 by zero per cent.

Yes, you heard it right: public expenditure in Britain will rise by zero per cent in the financial year 2013/14. What on earth zero growth means only Mr Brown knows. In the real world it means no growth and with inflation in mind that means negative growth. But in Brown’s cuckoo-land it actually means something completely different.

I have to confess that I have been noticing Brown’s strange behaviour ever since he was appointed Prime Minister and was close to calling the general election to legitimise himself. He then dropped his plans suddenly and explained that the reason he did it was because he knew that he would win the elections anyway. That surely must have been the most bizarre explanation ever given in history of politics for not calling an election. The men in white coats should have been alerted to Brown behaviour at that moment. It was clear that we were dealing with a deeply disturbed individual.

Since then Brown has been coming up with many absurd statements and behaved irrationally. His pathological obsession with twisting facts and figures and distorting other people’s statements has become legendary. The climax was the so-called bail out of the British banks, masterminded by Brown, which in effect proved that the Prime Minister’s judgement was clouded by some obsessive idea to waste as much public money as possible. The whole bail out package could have been only conceived in a deeply troubled mind, damaged severely by the teachings of Karl Marx who was himself suffering from serious mental problems.

I personally find it quite remarkable is that none of the opposition members of parliament have not yet questioned Brown’s fitness to stay in high office. You do not need to be a psychiatrist to see that this man is deeply troubled and obviously suffer from a paranoia. Why is it that not a single MP has shown any compassion towards Brown and asked the Speaker of the House of Commons to summon a distinguished team of psychiatrists to examine him in order to establish, once and for all, whether or not he can be held accountable for his actions due to a serious mental condition? Psychiatry knows of many cases when individuals succumbed to an overwhelming desire to waste huge amounts of public money. Cruelly, in the past, sufferers of this illness were denied proper treatment and instead were banged up behind bars on charges of fraud and abuse of their position. But in this caring age we now live in these cases are treated as mental illnesses.

And on another matter: I am surprised that no one in the House of Commons has had the courage to
propose that one piece of legislation which would bring instant relief to millions of people in Britain would be the reinstatement of the Usury Laws (repealed in 1854). Usury originally meant an excessive rate of interest charged on the loans. By Acts of Parliament known as the Usury Laws interest above certain rates was prohibited. Usury hence came to mean only illegal or excessive interest, which lenders like credit card companies impose on their customers. These loan sharks have to be punished severely, including closing them down and introducing fines.

Mr Brown, due to his medical condition, obviously sees nothing wrong with loan sharking. One more reason for the medics to step in.

-End-

Related posts:

  1. Could Gordon Brown Be A Victim Of A Mysterious Illness? It Is Time For Men In White Coats To Find Out

    Adam Lovejoy writes: With the way Prime Minister Gordon Brown is spending billions of £££ of public money on saving the banks, and the...

  2. I’m Starting To Think That Gordon Brown Might Pull It Off. Win The Election, I Mean

    I’m starting to think that Prime Minister Gordon Brown, working in tandem with Peter Mandelson (sounds a bit like the Medvedev and Putin act),...

  3. Gordon Brown Still Has A Chance To Avoid A Meltdown At The Next General Election

    Adam Lovejoy writes: So, is there any chance for British Prime Minister Gordon Brown to avoid a humiliating defeat at the next general election,...

  4. Gordon Brown&Co Are Taking Us For Idiots. Of Course They Knew They Were Bending The Rules

    Adam Lovejoy writes: Are you going to tell me that Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his chums in the cabinet did not know that...

  5. By Challenging The Archbishop Of Canterbury Gordon Brown Shows Astonishing Arrogance

    I don’t usually come out in support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams. My regular readers know that I have even challenged him...

Category: Let's Be Cynical  ·
Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Is Gordon Brown Fit To Be In Office? Let’s Ask The Medics”

  1. Exposé on July 3rd, 2009 6:59 pm

    OOPS!
    Proof-reader REQ!
    Here’s the VIDEO clip!
    Cheers!
    Exposé
    http://maxkeiser.com/2009/07/01/gordon-brown-says-there-will-be-zero-percent-growth/

Would you like to add a comment?