A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money

March 2, 2010

Thomas Mathew writes: Well, the best known secret is suddenly out: Prime Minister Gordon Brown is a nutter, who screams at his own staff, shoves them out of his way and threatens them with violence. Fear has gripped the corridors of 10 Downing Street, where some officials wear body armour and walk down the corridors, covering their genitals with their hands.

Mr Brown, as it was revealed, lives in cuckoo-land of his own greatness, where figures never add up, where black is constantly referred to as white and where lying is not considered a big deal. Oh yes, and where stating the bleeding obvious is presented as some great wisdom.

You want examples? There are many. The PM in in denial about bankrupting Britain to bail out the bankers and is conmstantly banging on about some ‘recovery’ and even ‘protecting fron-line public services’. As if there are any signs of that recovery visable and as if there are public services that are way in the back and don’t need to be protected. Like having water flushing the toilet, for example: why not let that shit float there for days and weeks? What would be the big deal?

Every time somebody asks Brown what cuts he plans to make in public spending to overcome the deficit, he says, with a straight face, that he doesn’t really plan any cuts, just a bit here and there. He is on the record saying that spending would continue to rise and ‘increase’ in 2013/2014 by zero per cent.

Yes, you heard it right: public expenditure in Britain will rise by a massive zero per cent in the financial year 2013/14. What on earth zero growth means only Brown knows. In the real world it means no growth and with inflation in mind that means negative growth. But in Brown’s cuckoo-land it actually means something completely different: a fair future for all.

Mr Brown has been demostrating signs of paranoia ever since he was appointed Prime Minister and was close to calling the general election to legitimise himself. He then dropped his plans suddenly, explaining that the reason he did it was because ‘he knew he’d win the elections anyway’.

That surely must have been the most bizarre explanation ever given in history of politics for not calling an election. The men in white coats should have been alerted to Brown behaviour at the time. It was clear that that the new man at 10 Downing Street was a deeply disturbed individual.

Since then Brown has been coming up with regular bizarre statements and often behaved like a deranged hedge fund manager. His pathological obsession with twisting facts and figures and distorting other people’s statements has become legendary. The climax was the so-called ‘bail out’ of the British banks, masterminded by Brown, which in effect proved that the PM had a fetish: to waste as much public money as possible. The whole bail out package could have only been conceived in a deeply troubled mind, damaged severely by the teachings of Karl Marx, who was himself suffering from serious mental problems.

It’s weird that none of the opposition members in parliament have not yet questioned Brown’s fitness to stay in high office. You don’t need to be a psychiatrist to see that this man is nuts. So why is it that not a single MP has shown any compassion towards Brown and asked the Speaker of the House of Commons to summon a distinguished team of psychiatrists, to examine him in order to establish, once and for all, whether or not he can be held accountable for his actions due to a serious mental condition?

Psychiatry knows of many cases when individuals succumbed to an overwhelming desire to waste huge amounts of public money. Cruelly, in the past, sufferers of this illness were denied proper treatment and instead were banged up behind bars on charges of fraud and abuse of their position. But in this caring age we now live in these cases are treated as mental illnesses.

And another thing: why is it that no one in the House of Commons has yet contacted Scotland Yard and asked them to investigate how it could have happened that a bunch of bankers could have tricked a lunatic running the asylum to give them all of the governmemt’s money to cover up for their corruption? It’s a very simple case of having the money one day in the Treasury and then having none at all. In layman’s speak it means ‘theft’, ‘robbery’. In expert’s lingo it is called ‘conspiracy to defraud’.

It is time for the medics to step in and save Brown. On compassionate grounds at least.

-End-

Bookmark to

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to Del.icio.us

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to digg

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to reddit

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to Technorati

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to Newsvine

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to Stumble Upon

Add 'A Case Of One Madman Blowing All The Money' to Google Bookmarks

Halifax Claims That House Prices In Britain Fell By 18.9 Per Cent Last Year. That’s Not The Case At All
Halifax, one the less competent banks on the high street, is claiming that house prices in Britain have fallen by 18.9 per cent last...
Recession Watch: Recovery, What Recovery?
R.F.Wilson writes: As they say, one man’s happiness is another man’s woe. Or, if you like the politically correct version of the same thing, one...
My Advice To Governments: Print Money To Help People, Not Banks
Adam Lovejoy writes: Have you ever wondered why is it that governments around the world are bailing out banks that have no desire to share...
The Current Economic Crisis Tells Us One Thing: Money Men Rule The World
Anton Goryunov writes: Say whatever you will about the current economic crisis, but one thing came out of it loud and clear already: money men...
Britain Releasing Al-Megrahi: A Case Of Short-Sighted Greed
Adam Lovejoy writes: Why did the Labour government release the Lockerbie terrorist Ali al-Megrahi? Compassionate considerations, obviously, had absolutely nothing to do with it. No...